MLS Clean Sheets Table 2026
Nashville SC have kept the most clean sheets, 17 from 34. Across the MLS, teams have kept a clean sheet in 20% of their matches, while CF Montreal have failed to score most often (14 of 34).
| # | Team | P | CS | CS % | FTS | FTS % | GA/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nashville SC |
34 | 17 | 50% | 6 | 18% | 0.74 |
| 2 |  Houston Dynamo |
34 | 13 | 38% | 10 | 29% | 1.26 |
| 3 |  Los Angeles FC |
34 | 13 | 38% | 6 | 18% | 1.18 |
| 4 |  Vancouver Whitecaps |
34 | 13 | 38% | 6 | 18% | 1.00 |
| 5 |  Colorado Rapids |
34 | 11 | 32% | 8 | 24% | 1.47 |
| 6 |  Columbus Crew |
34 | 8 | 24% | 4 | 12% | 1.53 |
| 7 |  FC Dallas |
34 | 8 | 24% | 8 | 24% | 1.50 |
| 8 |  San Diego FC |
34 | 8 | 24% | 6 | 18% | 1.85 |
| 9 |  Seattle Sounders |
34 | 8 | 24% | 8 | 24% | 1.35 |
| 10 |  Charlotte FC |
34 | 7 | 21% | 6 | 18% | 1.50 |
| 11 |  Chicago Fire |
34 | 7 | 21% | 3 | 9% | 1.59 |
| 12 |  Philadelphia Union |
34 | 7 | 21% | 7 | 21% | 1.53 |
| 13 |  San Jose Earthquakes |
34 | 7 | 21% | 5 | 15% | 1.50 |
| 14 |  DC United |
34 | 6 | 18% | 12 | 35% | 1.79 |
| 15 |  Inter Miami |
34 | 6 | 18% | 3 | 9% | 1.74 |
| 16 |  Minnesota United |
34 | 6 | 18% | 6 | 18% | 1.71 |
| 17 |  New England Revolution |
34 | 6 | 18% | 8 | 24% | 1.38 |
| 18 |  New York City FC |
34 | 6 | 18% | 6 | 18% | 1.32 |
| 19 |  New York Red Bulls |
34 | 6 | 18% | 9 | 26% | 1.82 |
| 20 |  St. Louis City |
34 | 6 | 18% | 7 | 21% | 1.41 |
| 21 |  Austin FC |
34 | 5 | 15% | 7 | 21% | 1.91 |
| 22 |  LA Galaxy |
34 | 5 | 15% | 4 | 12% | 1.68 |
| 23 |  Orlando City |
34 | 5 | 15% | 6 | 18% | 2.29 |
| 24 |  Atlanta United |
34 | 4 | 12% | 10 | 29% | 1.76 |
| 25 |  CF Montreal |
34 | 4 | 12% | 14 | 41% | 2.03 |
| 26 |  FC Cincinnati |
34 | 4 | 12% | 6 | 18% | 2.21 |
| 27 |  Real Salt Lake |
34 | 4 | 12% | 6 | 18% | 1.53 |
| 28 |  Toronto FC |
34 | 4 | 12% | 5 | 15% | 1.97 |
| 29 |  Portland Timbers |
34 | 3 | 9% | 7 | 21% | 1.79 |
| 30 |  Sporting Kansas City |
34 | 2 | 6% | 10 | 29% | 2.38 |
| League average | 34.0 | 7.0 | 20% | 7.0 | 20% | 1.62 |
| # | Team | P | CS | CS % | FTS | FTS % | GA/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Rapids |
17 | 8 | 47% | 1 | 6% | 1.12 |
| 2 | Los Angeles FC |
17 | 8 | 47% | 2 | 12% | 1.06 |
| 3 | Nashville SC |
17 | 8 | 47% | 1 | 6% | 0.82 |
| 4 | Houston Dynamo |
17 | 7 | 41% | 6 | 35% | 0.88 |
| 5 | Vancouver Whitecaps |
17 | 7 | 41% | 2 | 12% | 0.94 |
| 6 | Charlotte FC |
17 | 5 | 29% | 4 | 24% | 0.94 |
| 7 | Columbus Crew |
17 | 5 | 29% | 3 | 18% | 1.12 |
| 8 | FC Dallas |
17 | 5 | 29% | 4 | 24% | 1.35 |
| 9 | New England Revolution |
17 | 5 | 29% | 4 | 24% | 1.18 |
| 10 | Philadelphia Union |
17 | 5 | 29% | 3 | 18% | 1.12 |
| 11 | San Diego FC |
17 | 5 | 29% | 2 | 12% | 1.76 |
| 12 | Austin FC |
17 | 4 | 24% | 2 | 12% | 1.47 |
| 13 | Chicago Fire |
17 | 4 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 1.47 |
| 14 | LA Galaxy |
17 | 4 | 24% | 2 | 12% | 1.24 |
| 15 | Minnesota United |
17 | 4 | 24% | 4 | 24% | 1.29 |
| 16 | Orlando City |
17 | 4 | 24% | 1 | 6% | 1.29 |
| 17 | Real Salt Lake |
17 | 4 | 24% | 3 | 18% | 1.29 |
| 18 | San Jose Earthquakes |
17 | 4 | 24% | 2 | 12% | 1.53 |
| 19 | CF Montreal |
17 | 3 | 18% | 7 | 41% | 1.47 |
| 20 | DC United |
17 | 3 | 18% | 6 | 35% | 1.71 |
| 21 | FC Cincinnati |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.88 |
| 22 | Inter Miami |
17 | 3 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 1.82 |
| 23 | New York City FC |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.41 |
| 24 | New York Red Bulls |
17 | 3 | 18% | 6 | 35% | 1.71 |
| 25 | Seattle Sounders |
17 | 3 | 18% | 4 | 24% | 1.35 |
| 26 | St. Louis City |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.35 |
| 27 | Portland Timbers |
17 | 2 | 12% | 2 | 12% | 1.65 |
| 28 | Atlanta United |
17 | 1 | 6% | 3 | 18% | 1.94 |
| 29 | Sporting Kansas City |
17 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 18% | 2.06 |
| 30 | Toronto FC |
17 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1.94 |
| League average | 17.0 | 4.1 | 24% | 2.9 | 17% | 1.41 |
| # | Team | P | CS | CS % | FTS | FTS % | GA/G |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nashville SC |
17 | 9 | 53% | 5 | 29% | 0.65 |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo |
17 | 6 | 35% | 4 | 24% | 1.65 |
| 3 | Vancouver Whitecaps |
17 | 6 | 35% | 4 | 24% | 1.06 |
| 4 | Los Angeles FC |
17 | 5 | 29% | 4 | 24% | 1.29 |
| 5 | Seattle Sounders |
17 | 5 | 29% | 4 | 24% | 1.35 |
| 6 | Toronto FC |
17 | 4 | 24% | 5 | 29% | 2.00 |
| 7 | Atlanta United |
17 | 3 | 18% | 7 | 41% | 1.59 |
| 8 | Chicago Fire |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.71 |
| 9 | Colorado Rapids |
17 | 3 | 18% | 7 | 41% | 1.82 |
| 10 | Columbus Crew |
17 | 3 | 18% | 1 | 6% | 1.94 |
| 11 | DC United |
17 | 3 | 18% | 6 | 35% | 1.88 |
| 12 | FC Dallas |
17 | 3 | 18% | 4 | 24% | 1.65 |
| 13 | Inter Miami |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.65 |
| 14 | New York City FC |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.24 |
| 15 | New York Red Bulls |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.94 |
| 16 | San Diego FC |
17 | 3 | 18% | 4 | 24% | 1.94 |
| 17 | San Jose Earthquakes |
17 | 3 | 18% | 3 | 18% | 1.47 |
| 18 | St. Louis City |
17 | 3 | 18% | 4 | 24% | 1.47 |
| 19 | Charlotte FC |
17 | 2 | 12% | 2 | 12% | 2.06 |
| 20 | Minnesota United |
17 | 2 | 12% | 2 | 12% | 2.12 |
| 21 | Philadelphia Union |
17 | 2 | 12% | 4 | 24% | 1.94 |
| 22 | Sporting Kansas City |
17 | 2 | 12% | 7 | 41% | 2.71 |
| 23 | Austin FC |
17 | 1 | 6% | 5 | 29% | 2.35 |
| 24 | CF Montreal |
17 | 1 | 6% | 7 | 41% | 2.59 |
| 25 | FC Cincinnati |
17 | 1 | 6% | 3 | 18% | 2.53 |
| 26 | LA Galaxy |
17 | 1 | 6% | 2 | 12% | 2.12 |
| 27 | New England Revolution |
17 | 1 | 6% | 4 | 24% | 1.59 |
| 28 | Orlando City |
17 | 1 | 6% | 5 | 29% | 3.29 |
| 29 | Portland Timbers |
17 | 1 | 6% | 5 | 29% | 1.94 |
| 30 | Real Salt Lake |
17 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 18% | 1.76 |
| League average | 17.0 | 2.9 | 17% | 4.1 | 24% | 1.84 |
Scroll a table sideways for every column
MLS matches this season only, 34 rounds so far. Sorted by clean sheets.
What the clean sheets table tells you
A clean sheet is a match in which a team concedes no goals. It rewards the whole side, from the forwards who press to the goalkeeper who makes the saves, so it is a team figure rather than an individual one.
Failed to score is the mirror image: matches where a club did not find the net. Showing both side by side separates the teams that are hard to beat from the ones that are hard to watch, and from the few that manage neither.
Goals against per game is the cleanest way to compare defences that have played different numbers of matches. A club can sit high on clean sheets yet have a middling goals against figure if the games it does concede in are heavy defeats.
Many sides defend far better in front of their own crowd, so the home and away tabs often tell different stories.
More MLS stats
Team stats
Player stats
Top scorersAssistsShotsShots on targetKey passesPassesTacklesInterceptionsDuels wonBlocked shotsFouls committedFouls drawnPlayer cardsSavesMinutes played
Clean Sheets Table in other leagues
- Premier League Clean Sheets Table
- La Liga Clean Sheets Table
- Bundesliga Clean Sheets Table
- Serie A Clean Sheets Table
- Ligue 1 Clean Sheets Table
- Champions League Clean Sheets Table
- Europa League Clean Sheets Table
- Conference League Clean Sheets Table
- Championship Clean Sheets Table
- 2. Bundesliga Clean Sheets Table
- Segunda División Clean Sheets Table
- Serie B Clean Sheets Table
- Ligue 2 Clean Sheets Table
- Brasileirão Clean Sheets Table
- Saudi Pro League Clean Sheets Table
- Eredivisie Clean Sheets Table
- Liga Portugal Clean Sheets Table
- Süper Lig Clean Sheets Table
- Scottish Premiership Clean Sheets Table
- Belgian Pro League Clean Sheets Table
- Super League Greece Clean Sheets Table
- Swiss Super League Clean Sheets Table
- Austrian Bundesliga Clean Sheets Table
- Danish Superliga Clean Sheets Table
- Polish Ekstraklasa Clean Sheets Table
- Czech First League Clean Sheets Table
- Allsvenskan Clean Sheets Table
- Eliteserien Clean Sheets Table
- Romanian SuperLiga Clean Sheets Table
- Bulgarian First League Clean Sheets Table
- Veikkausliiga Clean Sheets Table